Ex. 3.20
Ex. 3.20
Consider the canonical-correlation problem (3.67). Show that the leading pair of canonical variates \(u_1\) and \(v_1\) solve the problem
a generalized SVD problem. Show that the solution is given by \(u_1=(\bb{Y}^T\bb{Y})^{-\frac{1}{2}}u_1^\ast\), and \(v_1=(\bb{X}^T\bb{X})^{-\frac{1}{2}}v_1^\ast\), where \(u_1^\ast\) and \(v_1^\ast\) are the leading left and right singular vectors in
Show that the entire sequence \(u_m, v_m, m=1,...,\min(K,p)\) is also given by (3.87) (\(\eqref{eq:3-20a}\) above).
Soln. 3.20
First, the correlation (3.67) in the text, for each \(m\), is given by
Therefore we know \(u_1\) and \(v_1\) solve the problem
To find its solution, we write out the Lagrangian function
Taking derivatives and setting them to zero yield
Multiplying the first equation by \(u^T\) and the second by \(v^T\), and noting the constraints (e.g., \(u^T(\bb{Y}^T\bb{Y})u=1\)), we obtain
We see that \(\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = u^T\bY^T\bX v\), and we denote \(\lambda := \lambda_1 = \lambda_2\).
Denote \(\bb{M} = (\bb{Y}^T\bb{Y})^{-\frac{1}{2}}(\bb{Y}^T\bb{X})(\bb{X}^T\bb{X})^{-\frac{1}{2}}\), we need to find the relation between \(\bb{M}\) and the pair \(u\) and \(v\). Recall the definition of \(u_1^\ast\) and \(v_1^\ast\), it's easy to verify that \(\eqref{eq:3-20b}\) can be rewritten as
Therefore we know \(u_1=(\bb{Y}^T\bb{Y})^{-\frac{1}{2}}u_1^\ast\) and \(v_1=(\bb{X}^T\bb{X})^{-\frac{1}{2}}v_1^\ast\) solve the optimization problem.
For the entire sequence \(u_m, v_m, m=1,...,\min(K,p)\), we have already solved the case \(m=1\). Consider \(1 < k \le \min(K, p)\) and assume \(u_j, v_j\) for \(1\le j < k\) have been solved as above. Then the problem becomes
The Lagrangian becomes
Similar to \(\eqref{eq:3-20b}\), we have
We multiply the first equation by \(u^T\) and the second by \(v^T\), and note the constraints here, in addition to \(u^T(\bb{Y}^T\bb{Y})u=1\) we have \(u^Tu_j=0\) for \(j < k\), we obtain the same set of equations as \(\eqref{eq:3-20c}\). Then the rest follows the same arguments.